Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Categorism is "[[Facets of categorism|prejudice, bigotry and discrimination]], [[Foci and abstractions of categorism|based on a categorization of human beings]]".''' | '''Categorism is "[[Facets of categorism|prejudice, bigotry and discrimination]], [[Foci and abstractions of categorism|based on a categorization of human beings]]".''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Note that [[categorization]] itself is not categorism. Categorization is necessary, and usually benign. It becomes categorism only when it stops being a tool for understanding, instead turning into a [[mental prison]], a [[social prison]] or [[Categorism As a Dirty Weapon|a dirty weapon]]. | Note that [[categorization]] itself is not categorism. Categorization is necessary, and usually benign. It becomes categorism only when it stops being a tool for understanding, instead turning into a [[mental prison]], a [[social prison]] or [[Categorism As a Dirty Weapon|a dirty weapon]]. | ||
− | [[Categorism]] has three aspects. These are the [[facets]] (how the categorism is done), the [[foci]] (what categorization the particular case of categorism focuses on) and the [[abstractions]] (how categorization itself becomes a case of categorism). Thus, beside being a [[the concept of categorism|concept]] in its own right, categorism is also a [[the conceptual framework of categorism|conceptual framework]] that contain these three kinds of | + | [[Categorism]] has three aspects. These are the [[facets]] (how the categorism is done), the [[foci]] (what categorization the particular case of categorism focuses on) and the [[abstractions]] (how categorization itself becomes a case of categorism). Thus, beside being a [[the concept of categorism|concept]] in its own right, categorism is also a [[the conceptual framework of categorism|conceptual framework]] that contain many concepts of these three kinds. |
+ | |||
+ | Any comprehensive struggle for [[universal human rights]] is a struggle against ''all'' categorism, not merely against any specific facet of focus of it. Any [[valid struggle against categorism]] is a struggle for universal human rights. | ||
This wiki explores... | This wiki explores... |
Revision as of 10:58, 10 September 2014
Categorism is "prejudice, bigotry and discrimination, based on a categorization of human beings".
Note that categorization itself is not categorism. Categorization is necessary, and usually benign. It becomes categorism only when it stops being a tool for understanding, instead turning into a mental prison, a social prison or a dirty weapon.
Categorism has three aspects. These are the facets (how the categorism is done), the foci (what categorization the particular case of categorism focuses on) and the abstractions (how categorization itself becomes a case of categorism). Thus, beside being a concept in its own right, categorism is also a conceptual framework that contain many concepts of these three kinds.
Any comprehensive struggle for universal human rights is a struggle against all categorism, not merely against any specific facet of focus of it. Any valid struggle against categorism is a struggle for universal human rights.
This wiki explores...
- Various facets of categorism, ranging from the three archetypical facets of prejudice, bigotry and discrimination to more specific facets such as marginalization, stigmatization and monolithization.
- Various foci of categorism, ranging from widely know ones such as racism, sexism and homophobia to more obscure ones like gingerism and witchparanoia.
- Various abstractions of categorism, such as "no true scotsman fallacy" and "guilt by association".
...as well as various examples, related concepts and recommended reading. The wiki is primarily based on the Human Rights Studies Master Thesis "Categorization of Human Beings versus the Universality of Human Rights" by Xzenu Cronström Beskow. The thesis is available for download from the university's server.
Development: pre-alpha
The development of this wiki is currently at Phase 1. This means that a lot of core concepts from the thesis are still missing from the wiki, and that there's a high chance that there are still basic structural bugs with the design of the wiki itself. If you have encountered this wiki already, please be patient. :-)