Difference between revisions of "Abstractions of categorism"

From Categorism.com
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Rights |Groups}}
 +
 
There are two ways in which [[categorization]] becomes [[categorism]]. The one called "abstractions of categorism" is the one where the categorization itself is the problem. This is when facets of categorism are applied to ''how'' we divide people into categories. (The other one is when the applications of facets of categorism is [[foci of categorism|focused on a certain categorization of people]], a categorization which in itself may or may not be reasonable.)
 
There are two ways in which [[categorization]] becomes [[categorism]]. The one called "abstractions of categorism" is the one where the categorization itself is the problem. This is when facets of categorism are applied to ''how'' we divide people into categories. (The other one is when the applications of facets of categorism is [[foci of categorism|focused on a certain categorization of people]], a categorization which in itself may or may not be reasonable.)
  

Revision as of 23:28, 8 September 2014

Script error

There are two ways in which categorization becomes categorism. The one called "abstractions of categorism" is the one where the categorization itself is the problem. This is when facets of categorism are applied to how we divide people into categories. (The other one is when the applications of facets of categorism is focused on a certain categorization of people, a categorization which in itself may or may not be reasonable.)