Difference between revisions of "Levels of context and hegemony"

From Categorism.com
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 37: Line 37:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Nation
 
|Nation
|rowspan="3"|Meso level
+
|rowspan="3"|Meso level}
  
 
==Sliding scales of hegemony==
 
==Sliding scales of hegemony==

Revision as of 13:04, 27 January 2021

When categorism is done, it is done in a social context. This context can be interaction between two or a few individuals (micro level), a biger context such as an organization (meso level) or a very big context such as a country or global subculture (macro level). In the given context, a certain form of categorism may be more or less maginalized or more or less hegemonic. In a context where categorism against a certain category of people is widespread or even hegemonic, it can be reasonable to count the people in this category as being oppressed.

Note that the categorization into levels, just like any other act of categorization, is of more or less limited accuracy: The boundaries between the levels are often more or less arbitrary.

Levels of context

Levels of context is a sliding scale: ranging from on one hand what’s going on within a single individual mind, to on the other hand what’s going on within the entire culosphere. The term “culosphere” refers to the sum of all cultures and all social life, just like the term “biosphere”refers to the sum of all biotopes and all biological life. This scale can be divided into three parts, called micro level, meso level and macro level.


Levels of context
More specific levels Broader levels
Individual Micro level
Group
Crowd Meso level
Organization
Local subculture
City


Nation Meso level}

Sliding scales of hegemony

  • work in progress
  • please check back later
  • have a nice day