Discursive alliance - Revision history

Xzenu at 14:19, 1 November 2015

2015-11-01T14:19:34Z

Xzenu at 17:30, 2 March 2015

2015-03-02T17:30:30Z

Xzenu: Created page with "People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each oth..."

2014-09-10T10:33:34Z

Created page with "People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each oth..."

New page

People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each other to gain relevance and interpretation privilege through the discursive alliance while marginalizing other discourses. (In Swedish: diskursiv allians)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 1 November 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	An antagonistic discursive alliance is easily upheld through [[dichotomism]]. Two sides arguing against each other, taking opposite sides of the same false dichotomy.		An antagonistic discursive alliance is easily upheld through [[dichotomism]]. Two sides arguing against each other, taking opposite sides of the same false dichotomy.
		+
		+	==Discursive alliances in example texts==
		+
		+	* [[Adam's homophobia]]: Cedric talking about gay people as being "other", as his way of defending himself against Adam accusing him of being gay.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 2 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each other to gain relevance and interpretation privilege through the discursive alliance while marginalizing other discourses. (In Swedish: diskursiv allians)		People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each other to gain relevance and interpretation privilege through the discursive alliance while marginalizing other discourses. (In Swedish: diskursiv allians)
		+
		+	An antagonistic discursive alliance is easily upheld through [[dichotomism]]. Two sides arguing against each other, taking opposite sides of the same false dichotomy.