Levels of categorism - Revision history

Xzenu at 12:40, 27 January 2021

2021-01-27T12:40:23Z

2020-08-12T12:02:31Z

2020-08-12T12:01:04Z

2016-01-31T17:11:37Z

‎Other divisions

2016-01-31T17:08:26Z

‎Other divisions

2016-01-31T17:04:06Z

‎Other divisions

2015-12-03T00:11:44Z

2015-11-27T10:47:36Z

‎Kyriarchy + misogyny as an example of levels

2015-11-26T12:30:35Z

‎Kyriarchy + misogyny as an example of levels

2015-11-26T12:29:56Z

‎Kyriarchy + misogyny as an example of levels

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 27 January 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	'''This is an outdated legacy page from [[The 2014 system]]'''.
		+
	This is an obsolete page, please ignore. See instead [[Levels of context]], [[Types of structures]] and [[Levels of hegemony]].		This is an obsolete page, please ignore. See instead [[Levels of context]], [[Types of structures]] and [[Levels of hegemony]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 12 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	This is an obsolete page, please ignore. See instead [[~~Context levels~~]] ~~and~~ [[Types of structures]]	+	This is an obsolete page, please ignore. See instead [[Levels of context]], [[Types of structures]] and [[Levels of hegemony]].

	The text below has not yet been removed, but remains only for reference while transitioning to the new model.		The text below has not yet been removed, but remains only for reference while transitioning to the new model.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 12 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	This is an obsolete page, please ignore. See instead [[Context levels]] and [[Types of structures]]
		+
		+	The text below has not yet been removed, but remains only for reference while transitioning to the new model.
		+
		+	****
		+
	[[Categorism]] operate through [[facets of categorism\|facets]]. These facets of categorism can operate on different levels. Ranging from personal micro scale to the global macro scales, as well as ranging from being a matter of how people speak about something to being a matter of structural patterns for how people behave.		[[Categorism]] operate through [[facets of categorism\|facets]]. These facets of categorism can operate on different levels. Ranging from personal micro scale to the global macro scales, as well as ranging from being a matter of how people speak about something to being a matter of structural patterns for how people behave.

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 ==Other divisions==
-As eight levels may be a bit much, it might be a good idea to group the levels into four categories (which are studied through very different academical disciplines):
+As eight levels may be a bit much, here are two alternative divisions. (Note that these ways of categorizingthe levels are thus far unpublished work in progress.)
 * A. Individual level. (Psychology, neuro-psychology and social psychology.)

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 * Structural
 **	Discursive
-**	Dogmatic
+**	Dogmatic/Normative (should dogmatic and normative level be separated or co-defined?)
-**	Normative
+**	Law
 **	Law
 **	International agreement

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 * C. Structural levels. Contains discursive, dogmatic and unspecified-structural levels. Levels such as "normative" could be added to this category. (Mainly sociology.)
 * D. Legal levels. Contains the law level and the international treaties level. (Mainly law and international relations.)
 ==Levels versus Category Agency==

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ==Kyriarchy + misogyny as an example of levels==
-The intersection between the facet [[kyriarchy]] and the focus [[misogyny]] is commonly known as "patriarchy".
+The intersection between the facet [[kyriarchy]] and the focus [[misogyny]] is sometimes known as "patriarchy", and here called by that name. (Note that while some people instead use the word in different ways, such as being a catch all term for all forms of structural misogyny, the word is here used simply as the intersexction between kyriarchy and misogyny.)
 * [[Individual level]] and [[group level]]: While patriarchy itself is too abstract for these levels, patriarchal structures, discourses, dogmas and so on can empower facets such as male [[supremacism]] and [[infantilization]] of women at the individual and group levels. Thus being "patriarchal" (inspired by patriarchy) rather than being patriarchy itself.
 * [[Systemic level]]: In a society where people systematically encounter almost exclusively men in positions of validated/unquestioned authority, their minds are likely to associate maleness with power and femaleness with lack of power.

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 * [[Discursive level]]: Constructing the language so that it constructs women/femininity as being inferior and constructs the same behavior as being cool when a man does it but shameful when a woman does it. For example, constructing the same behavior as a boy being "assertive" and a girl being "bossy".
 * [[Dogmatic level]]: Religious theology or political ideology positioning women as being inherently inferior and/or inherently assigned to a subordinate position.
-* [[Law level]]: Most countries used to have laws that enshrined male dominance, such as allowing only men to vote or to run for office. Some countries still have some such rules.
+* [[Law level]]: Most countries used to have laws that enshrined male dominance, such as allowing only men to vote or to run for office.
 * [[International treaties level]]: If two or more nations have ever entered a treaty where they promised each other to hold women back and help each other to ensure male dominance, [[contribute|please send information about it]]!