Universal human rights - Revision history

Xzenu at 08:07, 9 September 2014

2014-09-09T08:07:39Z

Xzenu at 08:07, 9 September 2014

2014-09-09T08:07:14Z

Xzenu at 12:34, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T12:34:22Z

Xzenu at 11:50, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T11:50:44Z

Xzenu at 11:50, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T11:50:33Z

Xzenu at 11:50, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T11:50:20Z

Xzenu at 11:45, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T11:45:20Z

Xzenu at 11:40, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T11:40:31Z

Xzenu at 11:40, 8 September 2014

2014-09-08T11:40:12Z

Xzenu: Created page with "''Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,\\ without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,\\ poli..."

2014-09-08T11:36:58Z

Created page with "''Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,\\ without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,\\ poli..."

New page

''Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,\\
without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,\\
political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.''\\
'''- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 2'''

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 However, as we base our struggle on categories, face a threefold problem of categorization of human beings versus the universality of Human Rights: Non-inclusiveness, inviting discursive struggles, and reinforcing [[monolithization]]. According to [[the thesis]], this threefold problem is resolved through [[the conceptual framework of categorism]]: Conceptualizing categorism as one unified concept which include related concepts rather than replacing them.
 {{#ev:youtube|cAUlkrG0_bU}}
 {{#ev:youtube|WIy-knJUG_k}}

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 However, as we base our struggle on categories, face a threefold problem of categorization of human beings versus the universality of Human Rights: Non-inclusiveness, inviting discursive struggles, and reinforcing [[monolithization]]. According to [[the thesis]], this threefold problem is resolved through [[the conceptual framework of categorism]]: Conceptualizing categorism as one unified concept which include related concepts rather than replacing them.
+{{#ev:youtube|cAUlkrG0_bU}}
 {{#ev:youtube|WIy-knJUG_k}}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * 2. They are widely accepted. (Universalism as legal positivism, Human Rights as legal rights.)
 * 3. They express universal morality. (Universalism as natural rights, Human Rights as natural rights.)
 {{#ev:youtube|WIy-knJUG_k}}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * 2. They are widely accepted. (Universalism as legal positivism, Human Rights as legal rights.)
 * 3. They express universal morality. (Universalism as natural rights, Human Rights as natural rights.)
 {{#ev:youtube|WIy-knJUG_k}}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.''<br>
 '''- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 2'''
 There are three ways in which the human rights are universal:
@@ Line 8: / Line 10: @@
 * 2. They are widely accepted. (Universalism as legal positivism, Human Rights as legal rights.)
 * 3. They express universal morality. (Universalism as natural rights, Human Rights as natural rights.)
 {{#ev:youtube|WIy-knJUG_k}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-''Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,''<br>
+''Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration,<br>
-''without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,''<br>
+without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion,<br>
-''political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.''<br>
+political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.''<br>
 '''- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 2'''