Difference between revisions of "Criticism and response"

From Categorism.com
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Constructive criticism is most welcome. This page is for listing, and responding to, criticism voiced against the thesis, the wiki or the the concept of categorism|c...")
 
(Is a society without categorization of human beings even possible?)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Is a society without categorization of human beings even possible?==
 
==Is a society without categorization of human beings even possible?==
  
'''Criticism''': The thesis does not discuss the possibility of building a society where people don't categorize each other.
+
'''Criticism:''' The thesis does not discuss the possibility of building a society where people don't categorize each other.
  
'''Response''': On the other hand, it does mention that categorization is a core feature of how the human mind works. And it also mentions that human cultures are built between human minds. In other words, it would not be reasonable to consider a society without categorization to be possible. Furthermore, categorization (with or without categorism)
+
'''Response:''' On the other hand, it does mention that [[categorization]] is a core feature of how the human mind works. And it also mentions that human cultures are built between human minds. In other words, it would not be reasonable to consider a society without categorization to be possible. Furthermore, categorization (with or without categorism) is not merely about categorizing other ''people'' - [[identity]] and other [[cateity]] is about categorizing ''oneself'' in relationship to other people. Can we imagine a society where the [[cateitization]] - the process of building and reproducing identities - does not exist?
 +
 
 +
(For further reading in the thesis, see chapter 6.1, "In what sense do categories exist?")

Latest revision as of 12:08, 8 September 2014

Constructive criticism is most welcome. This page is for listing, and responding to, criticism voiced against the thesis, the wiki or the concept or conceptual framework of categorism itself.

Is a society without categorization of human beings even possible?

Criticism: The thesis does not discuss the possibility of building a society where people don't categorize each other.

Response: On the other hand, it does mention that categorization is a core feature of how the human mind works. And it also mentions that human cultures are built between human minds. In other words, it would not be reasonable to consider a society without categorization to be possible. Furthermore, categorization (with or without categorism) is not merely about categorizing other people - identity and other cateity is about categorizing oneself in relationship to other people. Can we imagine a society where the cateitization - the process of building and reproducing identities - does not exist?

(For further reading in the thesis, see chapter 6.1, "In what sense do categories exist?")