Difference between revisions of "Categorization by Narrativism"
From Categorism.com
(Created page with "If “truth” is whatever makes a good story, we only need to know that the bad guys are the bad guys. Definitions and categorizations are secondary, and does...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | If [[narrativism|“truth” is whatever makes a good story]], we only need to know that the bad guys are the bad guys. Definitions and categorizations are secondary, and does not need to be comprehensible. To even try to analyze them would be to ruin the good story. Which may be something that only one of the bad guys would do, anyway. | + | If [[narrativism|“truth” is whatever makes a good story]], we only need to know that the bad guys are the bad guys. Definitions and categorizations are secondary, and [[Incomprehensibilization of the categorization|does not need to be comprehensible]]. To even try to analyze them would be to ruin the good story. Which may be something that only one of the bad guys would do, anyway. |
This is an [[abstraction of categorism]]. | This is an [[abstraction of categorism]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Categorization by Narrativism in example texts== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[A frivolous arrest]]: People making up their own stories about what is actually going on and why. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 1 November 2015
If “truth” is whatever makes a good story, we only need to know that the bad guys are the bad guys. Definitions and categorizations are secondary, and does not need to be comprehensible. To even try to analyze them would be to ruin the good story. Which may be something that only one of the bad guys would do, anyway.
This is an abstraction of categorism.
Categorization by Narrativism in example texts
- A frivolous arrest: People making up their own stories about what is actually going on and why.
