Difference between revisions of "Incomprehensibilization of the categorization"
From Categorism.com
(Created page with "Making the categorization hard to comprehend. The lines of who is or isn't included and on what basis people are included or not bay be fuzzy, mystic, self-referring, or simpl...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Making the categorization hard to comprehend. The lines of who is or isn't included and on what basis people are included or not bay be fuzzy, mystic, self-referring, or simply undefined. Either way, it may be taboo to discuss – complete with a whiff of conspirationalism: “If you question the concept of this category of people, it's probably because you are secretly one of them”. | + | Making the categorization hard to comprehend. The lines of who is or isn't included and on what basis people are included or not bay be fuzzy, mystic, self-referring, or simply undefined. Either way, it may be taboo to discuss – complete with a whiff of [[conspirationalism]] and [[guilt by association]]: “If you question the concept of this category of people, it's probably because you are secretly one of them”. |
This is an [[abstraction of categorism]]. | This is an [[abstraction of categorism]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 8 September 2014
Making the categorization hard to comprehend. The lines of who is or isn't included and on what basis people are included or not bay be fuzzy, mystic, self-referring, or simply undefined. Either way, it may be taboo to discuss – complete with a whiff of conspirationalism and guilt by association: “If you question the concept of this category of people, it's probably because you are secretly one of them”.
This is an abstraction of categorism.
