Difference between revisions of "Discursive alliance"
From Categorism.com
(Created page with "People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each oth...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each other to gain relevance and interpretation privilege through the discursive alliance while marginalizing other discourses. (In Swedish: diskursiv allians) | People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each other to gain relevance and interpretation privilege through the discursive alliance while marginalizing other discourses. (In Swedish: diskursiv allians) | ||
| + | |||
| + | An antagonistic discursive alliance is easily upheld through [[dichotomism]]. Two sides arguing against each other, taking opposite sides of the same false dichotomy. | ||
Revision as of 19:30, 2 March 2015
People agreeing on a key element of discourse. They may disagree with each other on everything else, being enemies in an antagonistic discursive alliance. Yet helping each other to gain relevance and interpretation privilege through the discursive alliance while marginalizing other discourses. (In Swedish: diskursiv allians)
An antagonistic discursive alliance is easily upheld through dichotomism. Two sides arguing against each other, taking opposite sides of the same false dichotomy.
