Difference between revisions of "Normalization"

From Categorism.com
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
----
 
----
  
Classic example: Normalizing violence against women, arguing that women ought to be afraid at all time and accept spousal abuse as well as rape-threats from strangers as their lot in life.
+
==Interactions==
 +
 
 +
This [[facet of categorism]] is an expression of: [[prejudice]], [[bigotry]] and [[discrimination]].<br>
 +
 
 +
It is likely to intersect with facets such as:
 +
* ''[[Violence]]'': Creating or reproducing the idea that violence against a certain category of people is natural, unavoidable or justified in one way of "they have it coming" or another. 
 +
* ''[[Supremacism]]'': Constructing supremacism as being not supremacism but instead simply the natural order of things.
 +
 
 +
As well as with [[abstractions of categorism|abstractions]] such as:
 +
* ''[[Equivocation]]'': Making a word for the targeted category synonymous with either the categorism against them or a justification for the categorism.
 +
 
 +
Examples of applying this facet to a particular [[foci of categorism]] can include:
 +
* ''[[Misogyny]]'': Normalizing violence against women by arguing that women ought to be afraid at all time and accept spousal abuse as well as rape-threats from strangers as their lot in life.
 +
* ''[[Racism]]'': Normalizing white supremacism by arguing that people of color are inherently inferior and that rigid race hierarchies in society are simply "natural" as ordained by God or evolution.

Revision as of 12:51, 28 December 2014

To normalize a form of categorism is to make that categorism perceived as more normal and acceptable.

The normalization may be about a specific focus or a specific facet. Normalization of a foci of categorism can be a matter of outright arguing that the targeted category of people had it coming, doesn't deserve to be protected from harm, or somehow simply doesn't count. Normalization of a facet of categorism can be a matter of downplaying or trivializing the harm this facet of categorism does. To normalize a facet of categorism is often indirectly a matter of normalizing certain foci of categorism, by normalizing facets that are often used against the targeted group.


Interactions

This facet of categorism is an expression of: prejudice, bigotry and discrimination.

It is likely to intersect with facets such as:

  • Violence: Creating or reproducing the idea that violence against a certain category of people is natural, unavoidable or justified in one way of "they have it coming" or another.
  • Supremacism: Constructing supremacism as being not supremacism but instead simply the natural order of things.

As well as with abstractions such as:

  • Equivocation: Making a word for the targeted category synonymous with either the categorism against them or a justification for the categorism.

Examples of applying this facet to a particular foci of categorism can include:

  • Misogyny: Normalizing violence against women by arguing that women ought to be afraid at all time and accept spousal abuse as well as rape-threats from strangers as their lot in life.
  • Racism: Normalizing white supremacism by arguing that people of color are inherently inferior and that rigid race hierarchies in society are simply "natural" as ordained by God or evolution.