Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Note that [[categorization]] itself is not categorism. Categorization is necessary, and usually benign. It becomes categorism only when it stops being a tool for understanding, instead turning into a [[mental prison]], a [[social prison]] or [[Categorism As a Dirty Weapon|a dirty weapon]]. For example, it is simply a reasonable categorization to claim that some people can be considered "men" while others can be considered "women". It stops being reasonable when the claim expands to insinuating that [[supremacism|women are inferior to men]], that [[stigmatization|women are dirty]], that [[demonization|men are evil]] or that [[monolithization|everyone who is of a certain gender think and feel in a certain way]]. | Note that [[categorization]] itself is not categorism. Categorization is necessary, and usually benign. It becomes categorism only when it stops being a tool for understanding, instead turning into a [[mental prison]], a [[social prison]] or [[Categorism As a Dirty Weapon|a dirty weapon]]. For example, it is simply a reasonable categorization to claim that some people can be considered "men" while others can be considered "women". It stops being reasonable when the claim expands to insinuating that [[supremacism|women are inferior to men]], that [[stigmatization|women are dirty]], that [[demonization|men are evil]] or that [[monolithization|everyone who is of a certain gender think and feel in a certain way]]. | ||
| − | [[Categorism]] has three aspects. | + | [[Categorism]] has three aspects and six [[levels of categorism|levels]]. The three aspects are the [[facets]] (''how'' the categorism is done), the [[foci]] (''what'' categorization the particular case of categorism focuses on) and the [[abstractions]] (''fallacies'' where categorization itself becomes a case of categorism). Thus, beside being a [[the concept of categorism|concept]] in its own right, categorism is also a [[the conceptual framework of categorism|conceptual framework]] that contain many concepts of these three kinds. It also operates on at least six different [[levels of categorism|levels]]. |
Any comprehensive struggle for [[universal human rights]] is a struggle against ''all'' categorism. Not merely against some specific facet or focus of it. Any [[valid struggle against categorism]] is a struggle for universal human rights. Never to use a person's rights/dignity/freedom/needs as an excuse to deny that person, or someone else, their rights/dignity/freedom/needs. The goal is to liberate people and minds, not to move them from one cage to another. | Any comprehensive struggle for [[universal human rights]] is a struggle against ''all'' categorism. Not merely against some specific facet or focus of it. Any [[valid struggle against categorism]] is a struggle for universal human rights. Never to use a person's rights/dignity/freedom/needs as an excuse to deny that person, or someone else, their rights/dignity/freedom/needs. The goal is to liberate people and minds, not to move them from one cage to another. | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 10 September 2014
Categorism is "prejudice, bigotry and discrimination, based on a categorization of human beings".
Note that categorization itself is not categorism. Categorization is necessary, and usually benign. It becomes categorism only when it stops being a tool for understanding, instead turning into a mental prison, a social prison or a dirty weapon. For example, it is simply a reasonable categorization to claim that some people can be considered "men" while others can be considered "women". It stops being reasonable when the claim expands to insinuating that women are inferior to men, that women are dirty, that men are evil or that everyone who is of a certain gender think and feel in a certain way.
Categorism has three aspects and six levels. The three aspects are the facets (how the categorism is done), the foci (what categorization the particular case of categorism focuses on) and the abstractions (fallacies where categorization itself becomes a case of categorism). Thus, beside being a concept in its own right, categorism is also a conceptual framework that contain many concepts of these three kinds. It also operates on at least six different levels.
Any comprehensive struggle for universal human rights is a struggle against all categorism. Not merely against some specific facet or focus of it. Any valid struggle against categorism is a struggle for universal human rights. Never to use a person's rights/dignity/freedom/needs as an excuse to deny that person, or someone else, their rights/dignity/freedom/needs. The goal is to liberate people and minds, not to move them from one cage to another.
This wiki explores...
- Various facets of categorism, ranging from the three archetypical facets of prejudice, bigotry and discrimination to more specific facets such as marginalization, stigmatization and monolithization.
- Various foci of categorism, ranging from widely know ones such as racism, sexism and homophobia to more obscure ones like gingerism and witchparanoia.
- Various abstractions of categorism, such as "no true scotsman fallacy" and "guilt by association".
...as well as various examples, related concepts and recommended reading. The wiki is primarily based on the Human Rights Studies Master Thesis "Categorization of Human Beings versus the Universality of Human Rights" by Xzenu Cronström Beskow. The thesis is available for download from the university's server.
