Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Categorism.com
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 711 by Xzenu (talk))
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* Various '''[[abstractions of categorism]]''', such as "[[no true scotsman fallacy]]" and "[[guilt by association]]".
 
* Various '''[[abstractions of categorism]]''', such as "[[no true scotsman fallacy]]" and "[[guilt by association]]".
  
...as well as various [[examples]], [[related concepts]] and [[recommended reading]]. [[The wiki]] is primarily based on the Human Rights Studies Master Thesis "[[Categorization of Human Beings versus the Universality of Human Rights]]" by [[Xzenu Cronström Beskow]]. The thesis is [[The_thesis#Download_the_thesis|available for download from the university's server]].
+
...as well as various [[examples]], [[related concepts]] and [[recommended reading]]. [[The wiki]] is primarily based on the Human Rights Studies Master Thesis "[[The thesis|Categorization of Human Beings versus the Universality of Human Rights]]" by [[Xzenu Cronström Beskow]]. The thesis is [[The_thesis#Download_the_thesis|available for download from the university's server]].
  
 
Please note [[From categorization to categorism|the difference between categorization and categorism. Which is also the difference between preconceptions and prejudice, between preferences and bigotry, as well as between choices and discrimination]].
 
Please note [[From categorization to categorism|the difference between categorization and categorism. Which is also the difference between preconceptions and prejudice, between preferences and bigotry, as well as between choices and discrimination]].

Revision as of 21:28, 7 May 2015

Categorism is "prejudice, bigotry and discrimination, based on a categorization of human beings".

This categorism has three aspects and six levels. The three aspects are the facets (how the categorism is done), the foci (what categorization the particular case of categorism focuses on) and the abstractions (fallacies where categorization itself becomes a case of categorism). Thus, beside being a concept in its own right, categorism is also a conceptual framework that contain many concepts of these three kinds. Of the six levels, the two most famous ones are the individual level (how a person believes, feels and acts) and the structural level (social, economic and cultural structures).

Any comprehensive struggle for universal human rights is a struggle against all categorism. Not merely against some specific facet or focus of it. Any valid struggle against categorism is a struggle for universal human rights. Never to use a person's rights/dignity/freedom/needs as an excuse to deny that person, or someone else, their rights/dignity/freedom/needs. Or to shut down one struggle in favor of another. To derail discussions to drown out important issues is not a good thing either. The goal must be to liberate people and minds, not to move them from one cage to another.

This wiki explores...

...as well as various examples, related concepts and recommended reading. The wiki is primarily based on the Human Rights Studies Master Thesis "Categorization of Human Beings versus the Universality of Human Rights" by Xzenu Cronström Beskow. The thesis is available for download from the university's server.

Please note the difference between categorization and categorism. Which is also the difference between preconceptions and prejudice, between preferences and bigotry, as well as between choices and discrimination.